In a bid to defend self against the claim that he has never handled a case as a Life Bencher, Wike has reacted angrily by referring to prominent human rights lawyer, Femi Falana SAN as “arrangee & errand lawyer.”
The ongoing public feud between the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nyesom Wike, and prominent human rights lawyer, Femi Falana, came to a head on Monday with the minister’s aide coming for Mr. Falana’s legal credentials all in a bid to retaliate.
Olayinka’s recent statements contradict Wike’s earlier aknowledgement of Falana’s towering legal status by the use of words like “senior lawyer”, “If someone of Femi Falana’s calibre.”
The minister’s aide, Lere Olayinka, responded to a recent claim by Mr. Falana (SAN) that Mr. Wike was “Nigeria’s only life bencher with no case in any court.”
Mr. Wike had accused him (Falana) of misrepresenting the recent Supreme Court ruling on the status of the 27 members of the Rivers State House of Assembly.
In an engagement with journalists in Abuja on Friday, the FCT Minister Wike said the human rights lawyer misled the public about the ruling and warned that such actions from a senior lawyer could cause unrest.
“A few days ago, the Supreme Court settled this matter of defection. If “someone of Femi Falana’s calibre” can go on national television and lie, it’s very serious. Lies can cause a lot of crises,” Mr. Wike said.
In response, Mr. Falana stated that he was being taunted by Mr. Wike over a Supreme Court case the Minister won, dismissing the attack as political.
“He went as far as dubbing me a ‘television lawyer’,” Mr. Falana said. “However, I did not respond at the time because Mr. Wike is the only Life Bencher in Nigeria who has never handled a case in any trial or appellate court.”
The senior lawyer added that he had refrained from responding to Mr. Wike’s utterances at the time because of the minister’s status.
He further clarified that his comments regarding the matter of defection were factually correct.
“All I said was that the matter of the defection of the 27 legislators was raised suo motu and determined by the eminent Justices of the apex court,” Mr. Falana stated.
However, in a statement on Monday, Lere Olayinka, Senior Special Assistant on Public Communications and Social Media to Minister Wike, challenged Mr. Falana to account for the number of landmark cases he had won to justify his elevation to the rank of Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN).
Olayinka’s remarks were widely construed as an indirect jibe on the Legal Practitioners’ Privileges Committee (LPPC)—the body responsible for conferring the SAN rank—and by extension, the Supreme Court. Critics argued that by questioning Falana’s qualification, Olayinka was subtly alleging irregularities or bias in the conferment process. “Casting doubt on Mr. Falana’s SAN status is not just a personal attack—it is a reckless assault on the integrity of one of the legal profession’s most esteemed honors,” a legal analyst observed.
Mr. Olayinka described Mr. Falana as an “arrangee and errand lawyer,” accusing him of contributing little to the development of the legal profession.
“It is funny and ridiculous that in the mind of Falana, only those who have handled cases in trial or appellate courts are real lawyers,” Mr. Olayinka said.
“Apart from going on television to make noise, what has Falana contributed to the legal profession? Even the SAN he got—was it not an afterthought—years after his peers had already attained the rank?”
Mr. Olayinka also spotlighted some of Mr. Wike’s contributions to legal education, including establishing and upgrading Nigerian Law School campuses in Port Harcourt and Yenagoa during his tenure as Rivers State governor.
He noted that under Mr. Wike’s leadership as FCT Minister, ongoing projects include the construction of housing quarters for the Nigerian Law School in Bwari, Abuja.
“The question is: what has Falana done for the legal profession?” Mr. Olayinka continued. “Even in his home state of Ekiti, he has no legacy. Bar Centres were built by Aare Afe Babalola (SAN) and Chief Wole Olanipekun (SAN), not Falana.”
However, critics countered that these initiatives were funded with public resources (Rivers Fund & FCT Fund), not Wike’s personal funds, unlike the privately financed Bar Centres built by Babalola and Olanipekun in Ekiti. “Wike’s aide should show what the minister has done with his personal funds, as he references Afe and Wole,”
In contrast, Falana’s decades-long career as a human rights advocate, including landmark cases like Fawehinmi v. Akilu (1989) and Agbakoba v. Director, SSS (1994), has earned him global recognition. His pro bono work for victims of state oppression and his role in securing the ECOWAS Court’s 2020 ruling against Nigeria’s Twitter ban were cited by supporters as evidence of his contributions. “Falana’s legacy is in the lives he’s touched, not just courtrooms,” a critic said.
Like his principal, Mr. Olayinka also accused Mr. Falana of misleading the public about the implications of the Supreme Court ruling on the Rivers Assembly leadership crisis.
He argued that it was based on the judgment that a trial judge, Emmanuel Obile of the Federal High Court in Port Harcourt, dismissed a suit by the Labour Party over the defection issue.
Mr. Olayinka also disputed Mr. Falana’s position on legislative quorum, referencing the claim that three lawmakers could validly conduct legislative business in a 32-member House, contrary to the Constitution’s requirement that one-third of members form a quorum.
“If, as a Senior Advocate of Nigeria, you could say three members form a quorum, questions need to be asked about how exactly you qualified for the rank,” he added.
